{"id":2124,"date":"2018-12-07T18:56:36","date_gmt":"2018-12-07T18:56:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/anthropology-of-aid\/?page_id=2124"},"modified":"2019-06-07T10:43:03","modified_gmt":"2019-06-07T09:43:03","slug":"2018-9-can-faith-based-organisations-offer-a-different-way-of-development","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/anthropology-of-aid\/the-issues\/rethinking-development\/2018-9-can-faith-based-organisations-offer-a-different-way-of-development\/","title":{"rendered":"(2018-9) Can faith-based organisations offer a different way of development?"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.0.106″ menu_id=”7″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” custom_padding=”||0px|” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” next_background_color=”#ffffff”][et_pb_row allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” custom_margin=”||0px|” custom_padding=”||0px|” module_class=”breadcrumbs-row” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Breadcrumbs (do not remove)” use_border_color=”off” module_class=”breadcrumbs” custom_css_main_element=”border-bottom: 1px solid #ececed;” module_alignment=”left” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.10.1″]<\/p>\nAnthropology of aid<\/a><\/span><\/span>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”on” gutter_width=”2″ prev_background_color=”#ffffff” next_background_color=”#ffffff”][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar admin_label=”Left Nav Sidebar” area=”et_pb_widget_area_1″ module_id=”left-nav-menu” show_border=”off” _builder_version=”3.10.1″ \/][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” module_alignment=”left” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

Can faith-based organisations offer a different way of development?<\/h1>\n

By\u00a0Calypso April, Ysabel Hannam, Jessica Brown, Freddie Gilbey, Lucie Bataller, and Sarah Keogh<\/p>\n

Faith-based organisations, or FBOs, use their values and networks to plan and practice development. In this piece, we seek to uncover whether or not this means that FBOs can offer a different method of development to the norm \u2013 the norm being the work of secular non-governmental organisations (NGOs). It must be noted that our aim is not to evaluate FBOs against secular organisations or to conclude which method is better. In addition, the category of FBOs is broad, so we have chosen to focus on the work of Christian international FBOs.<\/p>\n

Before examining what FBOs can offer to the field of humanitarian work, we first offer a definition. FBOs are religious organisations that are driven to carry out humanitarian or development aid because of their religious values. Whilst some organisations focus on evangelising, others seek to carry out humanitarian work because they see it as the right thing to do (Kline 2010). Christian charities especially have a problematic history, since Christian aid practices have historically involved missionary-style interventions, with a strong emphasis on proselytising and conversion. Whilst we acknowledge that these practices still exist today, in this blog post we will be focusing on charities that do not pose these kinds of problems.<\/p>\n

Development projects by NGOs often fall short of their initial aims and objectives. The reasons behind this are explored by David Craig and Doug Porter (1997) and exemplified by James Ferguson\u2019s (1990) ethnographic study in Lesotho. Craig and Porter (1997) extend the idea that development projects, professionals and organisations are \u2018primarily instruments of control, rather than of participation\u2019 (230).\u00a0 These instruments of control materialise in bureaucratic frames, which limit the ability of local people to express their own needs and desires.<\/p>\n

These issues are demonstrated in Ferguson\u2019s study of the widely considered failure of the Thaba-Tseka project. Ferguson (1990) argues that the project\u2019s failure to transform livestock practices was a result of incorrect assumptions made about the characteristics of the target population (192). From his ethnography we can understand the development apparatus as a \u2018situation in which \u201cfailure\u201d is the norm\u2019 (254). If this mode of secular development outlined by Craig and Porter, and illustrated by Ferguson, is regarded as the norm, we should perhaps look to FBOs for alternative perspectives.<\/p>\n

Dena Freeman\u2019s (2018) work on Tearfund provides evidence for how FBOs can do development differently. Tearfund is a British FBO that mainly works in international settings. They focus on poverty alleviation through disaster response, community development, envisioning churches[1]<\/sup><\/a> and policy change (Tearfund, 2018). Through her ethnographic research, Freeman found that there is a difference between people with faith practising secular development or \u2018Christians doing development\u2019, and Christian values being at the heart of the design and implementation of development, \u2018doing Christian development\u2019 (2018: 280).<\/p>\n

Freeman explains that the historical background to Tearfund\u2019s practices was similar to secular development. Christian values influenced and motivated people to engage in development work, but that was the extent of Christianity in Tearfund. After a consultation about the theology of development,[2]<\/sup><\/a> Tearfund decided that their practice of development needed to be more in line with their understanding of Christianity, namely that being Christian was about transformation in all aspects of life, rather than just going to church on a Sunday. Subsequently, Tearfund began to use the word \u2018transformation\u2019 to describe their mission. This word has a strong biblical connotation and emphasises holistic change (Freeman 2018: 284), which is in line with their ideas of Christianity affecting all areas of one\u2019s life. Tearfund put its Christian values into the design and implementation of their development \u2013 read transformation \u2013 work.<\/p>\n

Freeman\u2019s work on Tearfund provides evidence for how FBOs can do development differently. By using the networks that are already in place thanks to local churches, FBOs like Tearfund are able to reach deeper into communities (see also Kline, 2010). The long-standing existence of these local religious institutions also adds to the potential sustainability of these development projects. As such, FBOs are able to include local populations in many aspects of develoment projects, which does not happen as much in secular development agencies.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, FBOs act as facilitators, rather than as directors or managers of projects (Freeman 2018: 286). This means that they take on a supporting role and are guided by the wants and needs of local communities, rather than impose their own specific goals. Local people can call on FBOs for support, different from development agencies implementing top-down approaches. These approaches offer something other than traditional development.<\/p>\n

However, FBOs can be responsible for introducing problems into communities, as Erica Bornstein (2001) highlights in her study of World Vision. Bornstein exposes the conflict between the notion of the \u2018Christian family\u2019 and Zimbabwean culture that manifests as a result of World Vision\u2019s child sponsorship programme. World Vision in Zimbabwe encourages giving as a selfless act which aligns with Christian traditions. However, the existing culture of giving in Zimbabwe is limited to the extended family, so the work of such FBOs can create tensions within a local community.<\/p>\n

For example, a family can be targeted by others because they are recipients of a sponsorship programme. Similarly, World Vision can unintentionally create inequality and conflict within a family. A former sponsored child explained to Bornstein that his receipt of money from a stranger made his family jealous; his stepmother didn\u2019t understand why her other children couldn\u2019t benefit as well. Thus, the work of World Vision doesn\u2019t necessarily align with local expectations of how resources will be distributed and managed in international aid.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, the central beliefs of FBOs enable avenues of intervention different from secular organisations. This difference manifests ambivalently as Christianity is not always universal. Local churches and international organisations often hold very different perceptions of faith which can lead to conflict. Whilst FBOs create space for alternative methods of intervention, the extent to which they\u2019re more productive than secular ones is a matter for further research.<\/p>\n

Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n

[1]<\/sup><\/a> Which essential entails attempting to ‘spread the vision’ (Freeman 2018:287) of missionary work.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/sup><\/a> Convened by the World Evangelical Fellowship (Freeman 2018: 283).<\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bornstein, E. (2001) \u2018Child Sponsorship, Evangelism, and Belonging in the Work of World Vision Zimbabwe\u2019, American Ethnologist<\/em>, 28 (3), pp. 595\u2013622.<\/p>\n

Craig, D. and Porter, D. (1997) \u2018Framing Participation: Development Projects, Professionals and Organizations\u2019, Development in Practice<\/em>, 7(3), pp. 229\u2013237.<\/p>\n

Ferguson, J. (1994) \u2018The Anti-Politics Machine\u2019, in The Anti-Politics Machine: \u201cDevelopment,\u201d Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 251-278.<\/p>\n

Freeman, D. (2018) \u2018From \u2018Christians Doing Development\u2019 to \u2018Doing Christian Development\u2019: The Changing Role of Religion in the International Work of Tearfund\u2019, Development in Practice<\/em>, 28 (2), pp. 280-291.<\/p>\n

Kline, N. (2010). Disparate Power and Disparate Resources: Collaboration Between Faith-Based and Activist Organisations for Central Florida Farmworkers, NAPA Bulletin<\/em>, 33, pp.126-142.<\/p>\n

Tearfund. (2018). Tearfund: Homepage. Available at: https:\/\/www.tearfund.org\/<\/a>. [Accessed on: 29th November 2018].<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”1611″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”1611″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”1611″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

Contact us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”1611″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”1611″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

Find us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”1611″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”1611″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

Connect with us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”1611″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n