![\"\"](\"http:\/\/projects.alc.manchester.ac.uk\/double-helix-history\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/T5B1069-4person-300x201.jpg\")
<\/p>\n[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.0.106″ menu_id=”7″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.0.106″ title=”on” meta=”on” author=”on” date=”on” categories=”on” comments=”on” featured_image=”on” featured_placement=”above” text_color=”dark” text_background=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.15″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
How do we visualize DNA? How might we \u2018see\u2019 it? How is this \u2018thing\u2019 materialized in the imagination, conceived of, constructed? I wrote about some ways of modelling it in another blog, but recently I\u2019ve been thinking more about aesthetic representations.<\/p>\n
The last time this was really a big thing was 2003, a few years after the sequencing of the human genome (there is a good write up of art, music, and architecture, in the Economist<\/em><\/a>). DNA art is not really cutting edge now, it might be argued, possibly something to do with the genome\/ double helix becoming so well known and, well, commonplace, possibly? Or perhaps our understanding of DNA has shifted, slightly? Certainly those contemporary artists (see the end of this blog) that work on this are more interested in the social, political, and ethical implications of genetic testing rather more than the double helix or the genome as an aesthetic object.<\/p>\n However, I think there is still some use in looking at DNA art.<\/p>\n Partly this is because what there is of it gives us an interesting insight into social shifts around the communication of DNA and how it conceived of, and visualised. The most clearly marked of these is the \u2018authentic and original\u2019 work that businesses such as DNA11 have been producing since 2005 (some 10000 pieces according to their website, and available in a range of places including at one point the MoMA shop<\/a>). DNA11 \u2018creates personalized portraits<\/a> from a sample of DNA or fingerprints. Each piece is as unique as the person purchasing the piece of art; they are modern masterpieces that combine science and pop art\u2019. These are essentially genetic selfies. What is most interesting here is that the art produced is not a double helix but a different way of rendering the \u2018individual\u2019 sequence. The images are quite muddy, indistinct, and strange. DNA11\u2019s invocation of pop art is interesting \u2013 seen in the primary colours of their product, but also echoing a vocabulary of readymades, an interest in the superficial, and a clear sense of modernity that one might find in pop art.<\/p>\n DNA art like this is a bridge to understanding DNA itself, shifting from working by analogy to something more physical and representative. Art helps to analogise between \u2018self\u2019 and DNA, a way of translating and modelling the genetic make up of the body. DNA11\u2019s publicity also echoes a lot of other work on DNA art that emphasises the \u2018unique\u2019 quality of the genetic code. In 2012 Wired <\/em>reporter Brian Mossop<\/a> had his portrait done, and found it quite amazing:<\/p>\n But to me, the deeper meaning was realizing that if I reassembled the eight bands before me, I\u2019d end up with, well, me. Not in the literal sense, but more to the point that no other combination would produce the same result. And that originality became the talking point among those who saw my DNA portrait.<\/p>\n Once relatively unique, this type of work is increasingly commonplace<\/a>. Of course, you can also have your pet done<\/a>. The \u2018personalizing\u2019 of art that is found in this work seems immensely enfranchising \u2013 and, to a certain extent, derives its power from the same premise as the Quinn picture (see below). However the \u2018art\u2019 premise also ignores the fact that this is simply one of a suite of ways that the individual genome is becoming commodified (Helix<\/a> will, for instance, sell you a number of products related to your DNA, from matched-(literally) wine to personalized socks). It is also incredibly normalized \u2013 if you can have your DNA tested and aestheticized by an artist on Etsy and get a picture for under \u00a350 then the sense that this is novel in any way becomes lost. Indeed, it simply becomes another way of \u2018individualising\u2019 gifts or decorating living space. DNA gets hung on the wall and loses much of its aura as something \u2018unknown\u2019 or unknowable.<\/p>\n But back to 2001. I spent some of last week in the National Portrait Gallery archive, looking at the materials relating to Marc Quinn\u2019s image of Sir John Sulston<\/a>. This is an amazing image, product of a collaboration between Quinn and Sulston and reflecting both of their working practices. It was exhibited under the title A Genomic Portrait<\/em>, Quinn was then considered probably the most respected and cerebral of the Young British Artists, famous for Self <\/em>(1991), a sculpture of his head in his blood, suspended in frozen silicon. He produces a new version every 5 years. Sulston, of the Sanger Institute<\/a>, was the man heralded as the \u2018saviour\u2019 of the genome from corporate copyright, presented in various profiles as something of a rockstar scientist (on the basis that he rode motorcycles). The image was essentially a collaboration, a plate of Sulston\u2019s DNA agar jelly mounted on stainless steel. Commissioned by the NPG as part of a partnership with the Wellcome Trust, the image was intended to provoke debate about the nature of portraiture, of art, and of science. Many critics made much of this. Writing about the image in the Guardian<\/a><\/em>, Jonathan Jones suggested that<\/p>\n this is a kind of biological photography. As in a portrait photograph, a specific trace of someone has been fixed permanently. Through the most sophisticated modern means, Quinn’s work revives the primitive impulse at the heart of portraiture: preservation of a person.[1]<\/a><\/p>\n Ken Arnold wrote in Tate <\/em>magazine that \u2018Quinn\u2019s portrait insistently asserts the need to think much more laterally \u2026 fuses the ideas of portraiture and biography\u2019.[2]<\/a> The viewer looks at Sulston\u2019s DNA, sees themselves reflected in the stainless steel, and \u2018reflects\u2019 upon the matter of life, of representation, and of art. It is quite an amazing piece, conceptual and representational at the same time. However the \u2018concept\u2019 evidently wins over the \u2018image\u2019, and the discussion of the piece shows how DNA art often lapses into abstraction and intellectual conceptualisation.<\/p>\n More recently, and most interestingly, the artists David Blandy and Larry Achiampong produced \u2018Trust me I\u2019m an artist\u2019<\/a>, part of Arts Catalyst\u2019s series Dreamed Native Ancestry (DNA)<\/a><\/em>. Blandy and Achiampong undertook a series of Ancestry DNA tests to interrogate the claims made on their behalf, particularly around identity, and ask \u2018how does this removal of identity from its narrative and social dimension impact on understandings of race and relationships?\u2019 aI couldn\u2019t get to see the Ancestry event, but the fact that these two political and committed artists are now looking at DNA, and in particular genetic testing, suggests a new interest in the consequences of galloping testing and database expansion, and particularly about bioethics.<\/p>\n Finally, and I’m convinced this is a hoax, in 2013 CNN profiled Heather Dewey-Hagborg, an artist who uses ‘found’ DNA (on chewing gum, mainly) to reconstruct the faces of those who left it. Eerie, strange, and very creepy, her work is intended to provoke discussion about surveillance, privacy, and bioethics.<\/p>\n For these two last examples, DNA is no longer the \u2018subject\u2019 here, but metonymic for a wider set of discussions about ethics, politics, migration, biopolitics, and identity. DNA art becomes a way of thinking about much wider and more problematic concerns, a long way away from the hyper-commodified\u00a0 personal genetic portraits, but also, somehow, part of the same continuum.<\/p>\n [1]<\/a> \u2018Portrait of the Week\u2019, The Guardian<\/a>, September 22, 2001, \u00a0[accessed 15 December 2017].<\/p>\n [2]<\/a> \u2018Marc Quinn\u2019, Tate<\/em>, Spring 2002, p. 19.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n +44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n The University of Manchester [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” custom_css_main_element=”||” parent_locked=”off”]<ul class=”inlineList footer-socialIcons”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <a href=”https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/TheUniversityOfManchester” onclick=”var href = this.href; ga(‘send’, ‘event’, ‘Social media link (footer)’, ‘Open’, href, { ‘hitCallback’: function() { document.location = href; } }); return false;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <img class=”lazy” src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-facebook-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ data-original=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-facebook-50.png” alt=”Facebook page for The University of Manchester” style=”display: inline;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <noscript><img src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-facebook-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ alt=”Facebook page for The University of Manchester” \/><\/noscript><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/a><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <a href=”https:\/\/twitter.com\/OfficialUoM” onclick=”var href = this.href; ga(‘send’, ‘event’, ‘Social media link (footer)’, ‘Open’, href, { ‘hitCallback’: function() { document.location = href; } }); return false;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <img class=”lazy” src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-twitter-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ data-original=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-twitter-50.png” alt=”Twitter page for The University of Manchester” style=”display: inline;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <noscript><img src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-twitter-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ alt=”Twitter page for The University of Manchester” \/><\/noscript><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/a><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <a href=”http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/universitymanchester” onclick=”var href = this.href; ga(‘send’, ‘event’, ‘Social media link (footer)’, ‘Open’, href, { ‘hitCallback’: function() { document.location = href; } }); return false;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <img class=”lazy” src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-youtube-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ data-original=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-youtube-50.png” alt=”YouTube page for The University of Manchester” style=”display: inline;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <noscript><img src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-youtube-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ alt=”YouTube page for The University of Manchester” \/><\/noscript><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/a><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <a href=”https:\/\/plus.google.com\/+universityofmanchester” onclick=”var href = this.href; ga(‘send’, ‘event’, ‘Social media link (footer)’, ‘Open’, href, { ‘hitCallback’: function() { document.location = href; } }); return false;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <img class=”lazy” src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-googleplus-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ data-original=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-googleplus-50.png” alt=”Google+ page for The University of Manchester” style=”display: inline;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <noscript><img src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-googleplus-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ alt=”Google+ page for The University of Manchester” \/><\/noscript><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/a><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <a href=”https:\/\/instagram.com\/officialuom\/” onclick=”var href = this.href; ga(‘send’, ‘event’, ‘Social media link (footer)’, ‘Open’, href, { ‘hitCallback’: function() { document.location = href; } }); return false;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <img class=”lazy” src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-instagram-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ data-original=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-instagram-50.png” alt=”Instagram page for The University of Manchester” style=”display: inline;”><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <noscript><img src=”\/\/assets.manchester.ac.uk\/phase1\/templates\/images\/icon-instagram-50.png” width=”40″ height=”40″ alt=”Instagram page for The University of Manchester” \/><\/noscript><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/a><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/li><!– [et_pb_line_break_holder] –> <\/ul>\n [\/et_pb_code][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" How do we visualize DNA? How might we \u2018see\u2019 it? How is this \u2018thing\u2019 materialized in the imagination, conceived of, constructed? I wrote about some ways of modelling it in another blog, but recently I\u2019ve been thinking more about aesthetic representations. The last time this was really a big thing was 2003, a few years […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":" How do we visualize DNA? How might we \u2018see\u2019 it? How is this \u2018thing\u2019 materialized in the imagination, conceived of, constructed? I wrote about some ways of modelling it in another blog, but recently I\u2019ve been thinking more about aesthetic representations.<\/p> The last time this was really a big thing was 2003, a few years after the sequencing of the human genome (there is a good write up of art, music, and architecture, in the Economist<\/em><\/a>). DNA art is not really cutting edge now, it might be argued, possibly something to do with the genome\/ double helix becoming so well known and, well, commonplace, possibly? Or perhaps our understanding of DNA has shifted, slightly? Certainly those contemporary artists (see the end of this blog) that work on this are more interested in the social, political, and ethical implications of genetic testing rather more than the double helix or the genome as an aesthetic object.<\/p> However, I think there is still some use in looking at DNA art.<\/p> Partly this is because what there is of it gives us an interesting insight into social shifts around the communication of DNA and how it conceived of, and visualised. The most clearly marked of these is the \u2018authentic and original\u2019 work that businesses such as DNA11 have been producing since 2005 (some 10000 pieces according to their website, and available in a range of places including at one point the MoMA shop<\/a>). DNA11 \u2018creates personalized portraits<\/a> from a sample of DNA or fingerprints. Each piece is as unique as the person purchasing the piece of art; they are modern masterpieces that combine science and pop art\u2019. These are essentially genetic selfies. What is most interesting here is that the art produced is not a double helix but a different way of rendering the \u2018individual\u2019 sequence. The images are quite muddy, indistinct, and strange. DNA11\u2019s invocation of pop art is interesting \u2013 seen in the primary colours of their product, but also echoing a vocabulary of readymades, an interest in the superficial, and a clear sense of modernity that one might find in pop art.<\/p> DNA art like this is a bridge to understanding DNA itself, shifting from working by analogy to something more physical and representative. Art helps to analogise between \u2018self\u2019 and DNA, a way of translating and modelling the genetic make up of the body. DNA11\u2019s publicity also echoes a lot of other work on DNA art that emphasises the \u2018unique\u2019 quality of the genetic code. In 2012 Wired <\/em>reporter Brian Mossop<\/a> had his portrait done, and found it quite amazing:<\/p> But to me, the deeper meaning was realizing that if I reassembled the eight bands before me, I\u2019d end up with, well, me. Not in the literal sense, but more to the point that no other combination would produce the same result. And that originality became the talking point among those who saw my DNA portrait.<\/p> Once relatively unique, this type of work is increasingly commonplace<\/a>. Of course, you can also have your pet done<\/a>. The \u2018personalizing\u2019 of art that is found in this work seems immensely enfranchising \u2013 and, to a certain extent, derives its power from the same premise as the Quinn picture (see below). However the \u2018art\u2019 premise also ignores the fact that this is simply one of a suite of ways that the individual genome is becoming commodified (Helix<\/a> will, for instance, sell you a number of products related to your DNA, from matched-(literally) wine to personalized socks). It is also incredibly normalized \u2013 if you can have your DNA tested and aestheticized by an artist on Etsy and get a picture for under \u00a350 then the sense that this is novel in any way becomes lost. Indeed, it simply becomes another way of \u2018individualising\u2019 gifts or decorating living space. DNA gets hung on the wall and loses much of its aura as something \u2018unknown\u2019 or unknowable.<\/p> But back to 2001. I spent some of last week in the National Portrait Gallery archive, looking at the materials relating to Marc Quinn\u2019s image of Sir John Sulston<\/a>. This is an amazing image, product of a collaboration between Quinn and Sulston and reflecting both of their working practices. It was exhibited under the title A Genomic Portrait<\/em>, Quinn was then considered probably the most respected and cerebral of the Young British Artists, famous for Self <\/em>(1991), a sculpture of his head in his blood, suspended in frozen silicon. He produces a new version every 5 years. Sulston, of the Sanger Institute<\/a>, was the man heralded as the \u2018saviour\u2019 of the genome from corporate copyright, presented in various profiles as something of a rockstar scientist (on the basis that he rode motorcycles). The image was essentially a collaboration, a plate of Sulston\u2019s DNA agar jelly mounted on stainless steel. Commissioned by the NPG as part of a partnership with the Wellcome Trust, the image was intended to provoke debate about the nature of portraiture, of art, and of science. Many critics made much of this. Writing about the image in the Guardian<\/a><\/em>, Jonathan Jones suggested that<\/p> this is a kind of biological photography. As in a portrait photograph, a specific trace of someone has been fixed permanently. Through the most sophisticated modern means, Quinn's work revives the primitive impulse at the heart of portraiture: preservation of a person.[1]<\/a><\/p> Ken Arnold wrote in Tate <\/em>magazine that \u2018Quinn\u2019s portrait insistently asserts the need to think much more laterally \u2026 fuses the ideas of portraiture and biography\u2019.[2]<\/a> The viewer looks at Sulston\u2019s DNA, sees themselves reflected in the stainless steel, and \u2018reflects\u2019 upon the matter of life, of representation, and of art. It is quite an amazing piece, conceptual and representational at the same time. However the \u2018concept\u2019 evidently wins over the \u2018image\u2019, and the discussion of the piece shows how DNA art often lapses into abstraction and intellectual conceptualisation.<\/p> More recently, and most interestingly, the artists David Blandy and Larry Achiampong produced \u2018Trust me I\u2019m an artist\u2019<\/a>, part of Arts Catalyst\u2019s series Dreamed Native Ancestry (DNA)<\/a><\/em>. Blandy and Achiampong undertook a series of Ancestry DNA tests to interrogate the claims made on their behalf, particularly around identity, and ask \u2018how does this removal of identity from its narrative and social dimension impact on understandings of race and relationships?\u2019 aI couldn\u2019t get to see the Ancestry event, but the fact that these two political and committed artists are now looking at DNA, and in particular genetic testing, suggests a new interest in the consequences of galloping testing and database expansion, and particularly about bioethics.<\/p> Finally, and I'm convinced this is a hoax, in 2013 CNN profiled Heather Dewey-Hagborg, an artist who uses 'found' DNA (on chewing gum, mainly) to reconstruct the faces of those who left it. Eerie, strange, and very creepy, her work is intended to provoke discussion about surveillance, privacy, and bioethics.<\/p> For these two last examples, DNA is no longer the \u2018subject\u2019 here, but metonymic for a wider set of discussions about ethics, politics, migration, biopolitics, and identity. DNA art becomes a way of thinking about much wider and more problematic concerns, a long way away from the hyper-commodified\u00a0 personal genetic portraits, but also, somehow, part of the same continuum.<\/p> [1]<\/a> \u2018Portrait of the Week\u2019, The Guardian<\/a>, September 22, 2001, \u00a0[accessed 15 December 2017].<\/p>Related<\/h1>\n
Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>Blog: DNA testing goes popular (and daytime)<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>'Manchester's DNA' Schools Workshop<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>Ethics, privacy, and commercial DNA testing<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div> [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\nContact Us<\/h4>\n
Find Us<\/h4>\n
\nOxford Rd
\nManchester
\nM13 9PL
\nUK<\/a><\/p>\nConnect With Us<\/h4>\n
<\/p>