{"id":3410,"date":"2023-05-02T14:34:01","date_gmt":"2023-05-02T13:34:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/mancept\/?page_id=3410"},"modified":"2023-09-07T16:37:26","modified_gmt":"2023-09-07T15:37:26","slug":"debates-within-negative-freedom","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/mancept\/mancept-workshops\/mancept-workshops-2023\/list-of-panels-a-z-2023\/debates-within-negative-freedom\/","title":{"rendered":"Debates Within Negative Freedom"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” _builder_version=”3.0.47″ next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ menu_id=”8″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” module_class=”main-navigation” _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”dark” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ module_class=”header-image-section” _builder_version=”3.0.74″ custom_padding=”0px||0px|” custom_css_main_element=”padding-top:0px” transparent_background=”off” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#000000″][et_pb_row custom_padding=”||0px|” custom_margin=”||0px|” parallax_method_1=”off” module_class=”header-image” _builder_version=”3.0.47″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/mancept\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/257\/2022\/02\/Oxford-Roadcrop.jpg” show_bottom_space=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″ border_color_all=”#ffffff” custom_margin=”0px|||” animation_direction=”left” use_border_color=”off” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”3.0.74″ custom_padding=”||0px|” transparent_background=”off” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_row custom_padding=”||0px|” custom_margin=”||0px|” parallax_method_1=”off” module_class=”breadcrumbs-row” _builder_version=”3.0.47″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Breadcrumbs (do not remove)” module_class=”breadcrumbs” _builder_version=”3.0.87″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” module_alignment=”left” custom_css_main_element=”border-bottom: 1px solid #ececed;” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]<\/p>\nMANCEPT<\/a><\/span><\/span>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

Debates Within Negative Freedom<\/h1>\n

Ilkin Huseynli (University of Milan); Michael Garnett (Birkbeck, University of London)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Arthur Lewis Building: Room G.031<\/em><\/p>\n

Most of the recent debates over the concept of political and social freedom have focused on the relative merits of the negative conception of freedom on the one hand, and republican or positive conceptions on the other. This workshop will concentrate more specifically on interpretations of negative freedom, where negative freedom is understood, broadly, as the absence of obstacles to a person\u2019s actions. The exact nature and importance of negative freedom, on this understanding, remains controversial in a number of ways.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Theorists of negative freedom typically distinguish between obstacles in terms of their sources<\/i>: only obstacles for which others are responsible in some sense make us negatively unfree. What is special about the obstacles brought about by others? What is special about unfreedom as a social or interpersonal relation? \u201cBrought about\u201d in what sense? How, exactly, is inability related to unfreedom and ability to freedom? While some argue that the ability to do x is necessary for the freedom to do x, others believe that one\u2019s abilities are not directly relevant for one\u2019s freedom. According to them, one can be unable yet free to do something. What is it to be able<\/i> to do something, and how, if at all, is this different from being free to do it?\u00a0<\/p>\n

Theorists of negative freedom have also distinguished between obstacles in terms of the ways they obstruct<\/i>: for example, obstacles can be preventive, coercive or manipulative. They can make one\u2019s doings impossible or ineligible in various ways. What kinds of obstacles should be seen as creating unfreedom in the relevant sense? What kinds of normative theoretical purposes should motivate us in taking into consideration only certain kinds of constraints?\u00a0<\/p>\n

Other important and related controversies pertain to the value of negative freedom within liberal political thought and the possibility of measuring negative freedom. What kind of value, if any, attaches in particular to negative freedom? Should measurements of negative freedom cover not only the actual obstacles, but also the subjunctive obstacles as well as the probability of their occurrence? If so, how are probabilities best incorporated into the measurement of freedom? How are degrees of negative freedom related to the values of the options open to the agent?\u00a0<\/p>\n

Finally, some argue that freedom is an essentially contested concept whereas others claim that negative freedom, in particular, can and should be defined non-normatively. To what extent is it possible to conceptualize freedom in such a way that it can be endorsed by people with different political ideologies? Can there be such a thing as a value neutral<\/i> conception of negative freedom?\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

The panel will discuss the following questions:\u00a0<\/p>\n