{"id":4007,"date":"2025-03-11T11:12:17","date_gmt":"2025-03-11T11:12:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/mancept\/?page_id=4007"},"modified":"2025-09-03T11:14:42","modified_gmt":"2025-09-03T10:14:42","slug":"imagination-as-resistance-the-liberatory-forces-of-the-mind-against-epistemic-injustice","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/mancept\/mancept-workshops\/list-of-panels-a-z-2025\/imagination-as-resistance-the-liberatory-forces-of-the-mind-against-epistemic-injustice\/","title":{"rendered":"Imagination as Resistance: The Liberatory Forces of the Mind against Epistemic Injustice"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” _builder_version=”3.0.47″ next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ menu_id=”8″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” module_class=”main-navigation” _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”dark” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ module_class=”header-image-section” _builder_version=”3.0.74″ custom_padding=”0px||0px|” custom_css_main_element=”padding-top:0px” transparent_background=”off” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#000000″][et_pb_row custom_padding=”||0px|” custom_margin=”||0px|” parallax_method_1=”off” module_class=”header-image” _builder_version=”3.0.47″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/mancept\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/257\/2022\/02\/Oxford-Roadcrop.jpg” show_bottom_space=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″ border_color_all=”#ffffff” custom_margin=”0px|||” animation_direction=”left” use_border_color=”off” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”3.0.74″ custom_padding=”||0px|” transparent_background=”off” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_row custom_padding=”||0px|” custom_margin=”||0px|” parallax_method_1=”off” module_class=”breadcrumbs-row” _builder_version=”3.0.47″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Breadcrumbs (do not remove)” module_class=”breadcrumbs” _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” module_alignment=”left” custom_css_main_element=”border-bottom: 1px solid #ececed;” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]<\/p>\nMANCEPT<\/a><\/span><\/span>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

Imagination as Resistance: <\/span><\/span>The Liberatory Forces of the Mind against Epistemic Injustice<\/span><\/span><\/h1>\n

Room – Roscoe 2.8<\/em><\/p>\n

Somreeta Paul (University of California, Santa Cruz)<\/strong><\/p>\n

A particularly compelling case of epistemic injustice arises when there is a deficit in our shared tools of social interpretation, the collective hermeneutical resource, such that marginalized social groups are at a disadvantage in making sense of their distinctive and important experiences (Fricker, 2007). However, hermeneutical injustice persists when marginalized groups have produced their own interpretive tools to make sense of those experiences, which Goetze calls \u2018hermeneutical dissent\u2019 (2018). This, in relation to testimonial injustice, is a relatively new interest in epistemology that deserves further exploration. For instance, there are cases where the ones who are hermeneutically resourceful are, in fact, hermeneutically (and thus epistemically) harmed. They possess the conceptual repertoire to comprehend their experience and initiate successful communication, but instead become the victims of misinterpretation, appropriation, neglect, and, in the process, epistemically harmed. On the other hand, the ones who are hermeneutically deprived or can afford to be so, through their privileged racial, gendered, cultural, and class hierarchy, become the epistemic violators. Further, epistemic violators not only can be ignorant of their epistemic limitations but also ignorant of their ignorance (epistemic meta-ignorance). This can cause the oppressed to be disinterested in introducing their concepts to the worldly collective of hermeneutical resources because confinement and privacy can protect their repertoire from hermeneutic imperialism and appropriation. In light of these recent developments in epistemology literature, one might wonder how it can be ameliorative. As Medina proposes, it is the responsibility of all agents, both belonging to hermeneutically deprived and hermeneutically resourceful communities, but especially the deliberate or non-deliberate epistemic violators, to prevent hermeneutical death. But what are these responsibilities, and how do we initiate them? What and how revolutionaries like Sojourner Truth\u2019s definition of women (1851), Maria Laguna\u2019s \u201cloving perception\u201d (1989), Audrey Lorde\u2019s \u201cPoetry is not a luxury,\u201d or Hansda Sowvendra Shekhar\u2019s \u201cThe Adivasi Will Not Dance\u201d (2015) have in common that contributed to the hermeneutical expansion and prompted epistemic friction? Most importantly, how can we, as individual epistemic agents, do the same, no matter which category we belong to? Medina (2012) and Amy Kind (2025) have recently explored this social dimension of imagination. A change in resistant belief and comprehensive epistemic friction can be achieved by resistant imagination at the personal, interpersonal, and collective levels by virtue of its inherent ability to accommodate counter-moral situations. They can act as liberatory exertion to shatter epistemic hegemony and strategic ignorance. Further, imagination can aid empathetic perspective-taking, which is critical for just democratic deliberation. Broadly construed, it can be the responsibility of the socially privileged to channel imagination into empathetic perspective-taking. Or it can be the responsibility of the socially marginalized to articulate their experiences that help the socially privileged to engage with them. I aim to explore the benefits and risks of this line of thinking.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Wednesday 3rd<\/span> September<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n


Wednesday 3rd<\/sup> September<\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

11:00-12:30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Registration<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

12:30-13:30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Lunch<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

13:30-14:00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Welcome Speech<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

14:00-16:00<\/p>\n

14:00- 14:30<\/p>\n

14:30-15:00<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

15:00- 15:30<\/p>\n

15:30- 16:00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Session 1<\/strong><\/p>\n

Somreeta Paul: <\/em>Can Imagination change our social beliefs?<\/p>\n

Matilde Ferrucci<\/em>: How Standardized Imagination Can Still Be a Means of Struggle Against Epistemic Injustices<\/p>\n

Jiani Zhong<\/em>: Free Will as an Essentially Contested Concept: Which Conception(s) Can Catalyze Non-Retributive Revolution?<\/p>\n

Q&A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

16:00-16:30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Tea and Coffee Break (optional)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

16:30-17:30<\/p>\n

16:30- 17:00<\/p>\n

17:00-17:30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Session 1 (continued)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Francesco Cagnin<\/em>: Imagining Together, Resistance, and Understanding<\/p>\n

Q&A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

17:45-19:00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Wine Reception<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

19:30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Conference Dinner<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n


Thursday 4th<\/sup> September<\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

9:30-11:30<\/p>\n

9:30- 10:00<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

10:00-10:30<\/p>\n

10:30-11:00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Session 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

Te\u00f3filo Reis<\/em>: Dancing history against the grain: an epistemic reading of the Brazilian Carnival<\/p>\n

Michaila Peters<\/em>: Elegiac Imagination: The Antidote to American Fascism<\/p>\n

Q&A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

11:30-12:00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Tea and Coffee Break (optional)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

12:00-13:00<\/p>\n

12:00- 12:30<\/p>\n

12:30- 13:00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Session 2 (continued)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kieran Salt: <\/em>Imagining accurately: empathy or sympathy<\/p>\n

Q&A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

13:00-14:00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Lunch<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

14:00-16:00<\/p>\n

14:00-14:30<\/p>\n

14:30-15:00<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

15:00-15:30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Session 3<\/strong><\/p>\n

Asia Sakchatchawan<\/em>: Authenticity as a relationalist virtue<\/p>\n

Rochat Florence<\/em>: Complementary approach to the epistemic benefit brought by fiction: how narrative recourses and fictional worlds can help us in critically assess epistemic claims<\/p>\n

Q&A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

16:00-16:30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Tea and Coffee Break (optional)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

mancept-workshops@manchester.ac.uk<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n