{"id":2360,"date":"2023-11-21T16:10:48","date_gmt":"2023-11-21T16:10:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/political-perspectives\/?p=2360"},"modified":"2023-11-29T17:08:39","modified_gmt":"2023-11-29T17:08:39","slug":"to-throw-the-kitchen-sink-how-the-work-of-shelagh-delaney-challenges-the-legacies-of-post-war-social-realism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/political-perspectives\/2023\/11\/21\/to-throw-the-kitchen-sink-how-the-work-of-shelagh-delaney-challenges-the-legacies-of-post-war-social-realism\/","title":{"rendered":"To throw the kitchen sink: How the work of Shelagh Delaney challenges the legacies of post-war social realism"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″ _builder_version=”3.17.6″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.0.106″ menu_id=”7″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.0.106″ title=”on” meta=”on” author=”on” date=”on” categories=”on” comments=”on” featured_image=”on” featured_placement=”above” text_color=”dark” text_background=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Jennifer Jasmine White<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Shelagh Delaney is remembered almost exclusively for her \u2018gritty\u2019 debut. Why do critics still neglect all the fun she had elsewhere? Delaney\u2019s screenwriting credits allow us to consider what else she might have had to offer the post-war cultural landscape in Britain, and what she still might offer us today.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

A Taste of Honey<\/h2>\n

In 1958, A Taste of Honey <\/em>premiered at the Theatre Royal Stratford East. It was like a whirlwind crashing onto the British stage. The play was frank, funny, and sexy. It put working-class experience literally centre stage, and it didn\u2019t seek to parody or pity, but warmly centred ordinary life in all its contradictory glory. Delaney herself was audacious, she\u2019d sent the play to director Joan Littlewood directly, fresh out of school. The letter<\/a> she attached is a remarkable read, as Delaney urged \u2018I know nothing. I have nothing \u2013 only a willingness to learn \u2013 and intelligence.\u2019 Her remarkable capacity for self-fashioning worked, and the play was staged that same year. In an interview from 1959<\/a>, Delaney suggested that critical success to her meant the recognition of the working-class communities from which she came and had sought to depict. \u2018The locals came in, the bricklayers and the cleaners and everything, when they said it was good, and they\u2019d enjoyed it, I knew they meant it.\u2019 Delaney is wry and assured in the face of an almost parodically pompous ITN interviewer. He notes the \u2018sordid\u2019 themes of Honey, <\/em>asking where she got her \u2018information\u2019 from. Delaney giggles and replies that she simply applied her imagination to her observations \u2013 a formula she would play with throughout her career.<\/p>\n

Though that interview makes for amusing viewing now, it also shows us how unshakeable Delaney\u2019s \u2018type\u2019 was in the eyes of establishment critics. She was to be an aspirational poster-girl, an exceptional case that had grappled her way up the ladder. Even in today\u2019s criticism, that tired meritocratic template is clear. Alongside works like John Osborne\u2019s Look Back in Anger <\/em>(1956), Delaney\u2019s debut has come to be understood as a shorthand for \u2018kitchen-sink\u2019 realism<\/a>, even for the so-called Angry Young Men that she had little in common with. The role of na\u00efve Northern ing\u00e9nue is, as Selina Todd has recently shown<\/a>, a role Delaney consciously played up to in her first letter to Littlewood. It was a fiction she would never quite shake off. Where Delaney has been critically appreciated, her contributions tend to be seen as sociological, or a fluke of youthful authenticity. In fact, Delaney was an accomplished and complex artist, who threaded her gendered and classed experience through her work, but never definitionally so.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Delaney’s Experiment’s<\/h2>\n

As Joseph Darlington has suggested<\/a>, Delaney\u2019s literary work through the sixties reveals links to writers more commonly understood as \u2018formally daring\u2019. Delaney might be well read alongside some of the decade\u2019s most notorious literary experimentalists, like Anna Kavan and BS Johnson. As I see it, she might be even better understood in a canon of formal innovation that centres on the idiosyncrasies of gendered, working-class experiences, a canon that could also include Nell Dunn, Maureen Duffy and Ann Quin, finding contemporary resonances in the work of Claire-Louise Bennett or Isabel Waidner. The curation and analysis of that canon is one of the primary impulses of my own PhD thesis. Delaney\u2019s Sweetly Sings the Donkey<\/em> (1963) is a collection of short stories that defy classification. In one, a sick young boy flamenco dances himself to death. In another, the piece is made up of collaged letters addressed to Delaney from fans, working mothers, and threatening misogynists. It\u2019s a shame that Sweetly <\/em>remains out of print, given the recent appetite for fiction of the sixties and seventies, often by women, that playfully pushes at form and convention. If such trends do indeed mark the resurgence of the \u2018mid-century weirdo\u2019 as Jennifer Hodgson<\/a> has so wonderfully put it, Delaney deserves a place on the shelf.<\/p>\n

Delaney not only went beyond the kitchen-sink realism that has come to define her, but played with and through it, interrogating inherited notions of reality and political consciousness. In two works produced in the decade that followed Honey,<\/em> The White Bus<\/em> and Charlie Bubbles<\/em> (both 1967), a less prescriptive approach to identity and class began to come to the fore. The former is based on a short story from Sweetly<\/em>, directed by Lindsay Anderson, and first imagined as part of a three-film feature by Woodfall Productions. The anthology<\/a> was never released, and massively evolved over production, though Delaney was at one point pitched as the writer of all three segments. Her involvement is testament to a Delaney beyond realist theatre, and The White Bus<\/em> offers a wonderfully subversive portrait of post-war Britain. Its radical charge has all too often been credited to Anderson, with Delaney relegated to footnotes, despite the central idea being hers. As tourists trundle through Manchester\u2019s apparently triumphant rebuilt landscape, following a surreal bus tour, \u2018The Girl\u2019 speaks very little other than to politely decline the sexual advances of a pompous city mayor. Though she is the film\u2019s central character, she seems only to watch, watching others watch her city, that much is the point of the \u2018SEE YOUR CITY BUS\u2019, to \u2018see your city as it really is.\u2019<\/p>\n

In Charlie Bubbles<\/em>, Delaney\u2019s other sixties screenwriting credit, Albert Finney plays a young working-class writer returning to Manchester for a deeply bizarre forty-eight hours, eventually drifting off toward the clouds in an inexplicable hot air balloon. In both films, a preoccupation with what it means to watch and create, and how social class shapes those processes, is central. Exaggeratedly parochial opinions of Charlie are constantly projected onto him, as acquaintances ask similar questions in what feels like every scene: \u2018Lived most of your time in London since your success, sir?’ and \u2018He’s from the North, isn’t he? But he doesn’t live there anymore, does he?\u2019 Both works utilise the stock-figure of the apparently exceptional talent that has escaped to tell it like it is, a myth Delaney herself would remain entangled with – and perhaps already knew it.<\/p>\n

It is not just the na\u00efve Northern artist that is satirised by these films, but the whole notion of Manchester, or indeed any place, as understood within the bounds of the \u2018like it is.\u2019 The White Bus<\/em> leaves epistemological clarity beyond the viewer\u2019s grasp. That which we instinctively read as unreal is fact \u2013 the whacky bus tour was a real example of Manchester\u2019s civic PR efforts. Conversely, supposedly gritty realities are literal fictions – the couple that fight on the street at the end of the film take their dialogue almost verbatim from A Taste of Honey<\/em>. In Charlie Bubbles<\/em>, clashes of class and social mythmaking are parodied to the extreme. In the opening scenes, Charlie and a friend riotously cover each other in food as his middle-class financial advisors sternly continue their conversation in the background. Later, driving down the M6, a young Liza Minelli reveals her yearning for the glamours of Manchester, before galloping with glee through piles of rubble, unable to contain her excitement upon glimpsing the gasworks. \u2018Look at the view up here!\u2019 Minelli gushes in the manner of a wide-eyed Hollywood heroine.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

(Working-class) Girls Just Want To Have Fun<\/h2>\n

These experiments with reality are particularly politically significant within this cultural context, one where working-class-ness itself was so bound up with the irrefutably \u2018authentic.\u2019 If it\u2019s grim up North, working-class art forms in the sixties were thought predominantly valuable for their forensic documentation of the fact. Yet The White Bus <\/em>refuses to delineate myth from reality, and Charlie Bubbles<\/em> stretches and inverts conventional narratives of aspiration and authenticity to such an extent as to reveal the bizarre unreality at their core. In Delaney\u2019s scripts, working-class stories might also be surreal, non-linear, and downright weird. At the end of Charlie Bubbles,<\/em> Charlie notices a hot air balloon from his window and silently walks towards it before climbing in, cutting the rope, and sailing off above the clouds. In a film that has parodied the tensions surrounding working-class aspiration and its chronicling, such a moment is a final gesture towards the refusal of a \u2018conventional\u2019 social realism. Only the most absurdly physical rendering of upwards mobility will do.<\/p>\n

The lack of attention given to Delaney is partly the product of deep-set political biases against her as a working-class woman. Delaney is by no means a singular authority on Northern working-class life, nor should her work be understood exclusively as a product of that positionality. Yet works such as The White Bus <\/em>and Charlie Bubbles<\/em> show what is possible when working-class women are given the space to render their experiences through consciously playful and imaginative forms, and that much bears exploring further.<\/p>\n

Only recently for instance has the work of Delaney\u2019s contemporary, Lorenza Mazzetti<\/a>, found critical recognition in Britain. The Free Cinema movement, in which Mazzetti was intimately involved, provided one opportunity for a form of social realism that didn\u2019t shy away from experiment. Joan Littlewood\u2019s plans for a \u2018Fun Palace\u2019<\/a>, a site that reimagined working-class consciousness through radical play and freedom, gesture towards another.<\/p>\n

On Delaney\u2019s under-acknowledged legacies, Anna Coatman has written brilliantly for Sight and Sound<\/em><\/a>. It seems obvious to suggest that the formally experimental and the socially conscious might coexist, yet neglect of Delaney\u2019s later works is just one instance of resistance to such ideas. As I continue to research, further possibilities for dialogue between experimental or avant-garde feminist works and the legacies of social realism and working-class culture emerge. Previously perceived as mutually exclusive spheres, writers like Delaney prove they might in fact be held in duality.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/h2>\n

Short Bio<\/h2>\n

\"\"Jennifer Jasmine White is a PhD candidate at the University of Manchester, with first-class degrees from the University of Cambridge (BA) and the University of Oxford (MSt). Her thesis explores the relationship between experimental form, women\u2019s writing, and working-class culture. Her PhD is fully funded by a President\u2019s Doctoral Scholarship.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

For more about her research, you can find her on Twitter: @Jennifer_J_W<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

The labour struggle of early career researchers \u2013 comparing the situation in the UK and Germany<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Barbie: International Law, War, and Feminist \u2018Utopias\u2019<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Interview series 'life after the PhD': Alex Hartland<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n