{"id":1516,"date":"2022-05-25T10:57:31","date_gmt":"2022-05-25T09:57:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/?p=1516"},"modified":"2025-11-06T10:41:50","modified_gmt":"2025-11-06T10:41:50","slug":"why-do-we-pay-mps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/2022\/05\/25\/why-do-we-pay-mps\/","title":{"rendered":"Why do we pay MPs?"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.17.6″ menu_id=”8″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.17.6″ featured_placement=”above” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” date_format=”j M Y” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

\"Gold<\/p>\n

The Parliament Act 1911 is often remembered for its role in reigning in the House of Lords, and establishing the elected Commons as the dominant force in the United Kingdom legislature.\u00a0 \u00a0Without a doubt, this development was of immense importance, but the statute had a wider function in rendering the British constitutional process more inclusive and democratic.\u00a0 For the first time, it awarded a salary to MPs, which was a game-changing\u00a0move, because it opened the doors of Parliament to people who needed to work for a living.\u00a0 Prior to this, men (of course at this time it was still exclusively men) could only sit in the House of Commons if they had enough private money to support themselves.<\/p>\n

In practical terms, this situation excluded huge swathes of the population from participating in politics at this level, which is a good example of how the absence of action on a concrete issue can have a powerful effect, sometimes one which benefits existing vested interests.\u00a0 In addressing the systemic exclusion of certain groups, it is not sufficient to simply refrain from actively imposing discriminatory policies, it is important to consider practical barriers.\u00a0\u00a0 There had been debates around remunerating MPs going back to at least the XVIII century, but up until the Parliament Act 1911, these had always run into the sand.\u00a0 The absence<\/em> of legislation to grant MPs an income stream had kept Westminster as the exclusive domain of the social elite for centuries, and had achieved this just as effectively as a positive requirement to demonstrate a certain level of wealth.<\/p>\n

It is key to highlight this in the context of modern debates about MPs and earning.\u00a0\u00a0 If Members of Parliament were not paid, then our legislature would belong only to the affluent, and those with rich backers. It would also potentially make the House of Commons even more susceptible to corruption and undue influence.\u00a0\u00a0 If an MP without private means was sponsored by a private patron or an organisation, then those doing the back-rolling would, in all probability, control their voting choices.<\/p>\n

Of course, acknowledging that MPs need to be paid something leaves open the question of how much is appropriate. At present, they earn \u00a384, 144, which for context, is roughly comparable to a consultant surgeon or physician in the NHS.\u00a0\u00a0 It is also true that MPs are entitled to claim a variety of expenses on top of this basic salary, and scandals around the use and abuse of this arrangement are a perennial feature of British political life.\u00a0 Nevertheless, setting aside the specific question of legitimate, and more to the point, illegitimate use of expenses, there is a debate to be had about the appropriate level of pay for Parliamentarians.<\/p>\n

On the one hand, the average earnings for adults in the UK is \u00a331,772, and MPs are receiving almost triple this amount.\u00a0 Therefore, some might argue that it would be more appropriate for them to be paid a salary closer to the sum typically received by their constituents.\u00a0\u00a0 At the same time, it could be countered that MPs work long and demanding hours, and are expected to process complex information and engage with nuanced debates, meaning that their work is in keeping with a demanding professional role.\u00a0\u00a0 They also have to endure a high degree of job insecurity, as re-election can never be guaranteed, and in some swing seats their position is especially precarious.\u00a0\u00a0 On top of all of which, there is a significant loss of privacy and family time, and a genuine danger in terms of personal security.<\/p>\n

All things considered, there is scope for reasonable people to disagree about how much MPs should be financially rewarded for their role.\u00a0\u00a0 However, the basic principle that they should earn enough money to open the doors of the Chamber to all citizens, regardless of background, is something which should be affirmed.\u00a0 The Parliament Act introduced a suite of reforms to help the United Kingdom\u2019s Constitution become more truly inclusive and participatory.\u00a0 This still very much remains a work in progress, but we cannot afford to lose sight of this goal, and it should also be borne in mind when there are wider debates about the working practices of the House of Commons, e.g. how flexible are the hours for those with children or other caring responsibilities?\u00a0 Is there a toxic and masculine, or religiously exclusive culture around bars and drinking alcohol?\u00a0\u00a0 Do we deal appropriately with issues around harassment or discrimination in the workplace?\u00a0\u00a0 If people in 1911 were prepared to radically restructure the treatment of MPs, perhaps we should be willing to do the same in the XXI century. After all, the same basic question is at stake: do we want the people representing us to be drawn from a spectrum of society, or only a certain group?<\/p>\n

Related Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cMPs Salaries-What do they earn?\u00a0 Is it too much?\u201d Politics.co.uk\u00a0 <\/em>https:\/\/www.politics.co.uk\/reference\/mps-salary\/ (20\/2\/22)<\/p>\n

\u201cPay and expenses for MPs\u201d UK Parliament<\/em> https:\/\/www.parliament.uk\/about\/mps-and-lords\/members\/pay-mps\/<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cPay scales for Consultants in England\u201d The British Medical Association<\/em> https:\/\/www.bma.org.uk\/pay-and-contracts\/pay\/consultants-pay-scales\/pay-scales-for-consultants-in-england<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

When is a marriage not a marriage? Registration, religious weddings and nullity<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Memory, Democracy and the Tomb of Francisco Franco<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Anti-Semitism, Racism and Religious Prejudice-Dayenu<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n