{"id":1545,"date":"2021-09-03T14:20:50","date_gmt":"2021-09-03T13:20:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/?p=1545"},"modified":"2025-11-06T11:56:54","modified_gmt":"2025-11-06T11:56:54","slug":"marriage-law-why-consummation-should-be-abolished","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/2021\/09\/03\/marriage-law-why-consummation-should-be-abolished\/","title":{"rendered":"Marriage Law-Why Consummation Should Be Abolished."},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.17.6″ menu_id=”8″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.17.6″ featured_placement=”above” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” date_format=”j M Y” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

\"Double<\/p>\n

Consensus amongst the legal community is unusual, but there is widespread agreement that Marriage Law in England and Wales is long overdue for reform.\u00a0 The Law Commission is currently formulating policy proposals on the legal arrangements for weddings.<\/p>\n

Predictably perhaps, much of the media focus has been on proposals around venues, and the possibility of more couples having the chance to legally marry on beaches, cliff-tops or even in their own back-garden. However, a number of academic commentators coming from different perspectives, for example authors like Maine, Herring and Stychin, have all questioned whether a more intimate dimension of Marriage Law is ripe for attention.\u00a0 Section 12(1)(a) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 allows for a heterosexual marriage to be annulled if either party is incapable of consummating it, and s12(1)(b) allows a party to petition for nullity if their spouse \u201cwilfully refuses\u201d to consummate (N.B. It is not possible to have the marriage set aside on the basis of your own wilful refusal).<\/p>\n

These provisions do not apply to same sex marriages, and prior to the passage of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, opponents of reform tried to suggest that the requirement for consummation made same sex marriage legally unworkable, or at least impractical without root and branch reform of Marriage Law.\u00a0 As we observed at the time, this argument made very little sense, because s13(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act stipulates that if someone is aware that they have grounds to have the marry annulled, but behave in such a way that their spouse reasonably believes that they will not do so, no decree of nullity will be granted where it would be unjust to the other party.<\/p>\n

It is settled law in England and Wales that consummation means \u201cordinary and complete\u201d penile penetration of the vagina (although ejaculation is not necessary).\u00a0 This being the case, it does not require a PhD in biology to understand that incapacity will apply to a same sex couple. \u00a0\u00a0If going through a legally binding wedding ceremony is not indicative of a desire to be married despite this, and stripping marital status from the unsuspecting other party would not be unjust, it is hard to imagine when s13(1) would ever apply.\u00a0\u00a0 Consummation was never a genuine obstacle to same sex marriage, it was just an ineffective make-shift weapon grabbed in panic by traditionalists manning the barricades.<\/p>\n

We would affirm, nevertheless, that maintaining the requirement for consummation sustains an unequal approach to marriage.\u00a0 The different legal treatment sends the message that same sex marriages are materially different in nature and quality from heterosexual ones, undermining the fundamental value of equality and idea that \u201clove is love\u201d.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, we would argue that maintaining consummation is equally problematic in terms of its symbolic, and practical impact on heterosexual couples.\u00a0 Why should one group of citizens be subject to any form of mandatory sexual activity as a gateway to a particular legal status?\u00a0\u00a0 The doctrine of consummation has its roots in Canon Law, and even more deeply, in patriarchal interests in controlling relationships, human reproduction and family assets.\u00a0 Traditional marriage was indeed a way to ensure that women could be used as transferable assets to cement alliances and manage ownership of land and resources, which would give powerful men a degree of reassurance that the children they were raising were their own, and save communities the collective burden of infants without an adult male guardian.\u00a0 It was moulded by religious doctrine, and provided a structure for household units in a world with rigid gender norms and roles.<\/p>\n

Of course, there are reasons why we have used the past tense in the preceding paragraph, needless to say, we are not suggesting that couples who choose to be married in the XXI century are buying into a pre-modern social institution.\u00a0 \u00a0Happily, our collective understanding of marriage has broadened and diversified, and the law in general reflects this.\u00a0 As a result, in our view, it is time that the requirement for consummation is removed, as a vestige of a very different model of marital relationships.<\/p>\n

Having distinct legal doctrines applicable to same sex and heterosexual marriage is undesirable in terms of justice, equality and the symbolism of the law.\u00a0 Yet is it also true that maintenance of consummation imposes an intrusive and irrational burden on heterosexual couples, and perpetuates an association between marriage and the control of women and sexual relationships.\u00a0 For a variety of reasons, Parliament must shift this doctrine from the realm of Family Law to Legal History.<\/p>\n

Related Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Law Commission-Weddings<\/a><\/p>\n

Weddings: Call to allow ceremonies outdoors and at home<\/a> BBC News <\/em>(3\/2\/20)<\/p>\n

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013<\/a><\/p>\n

Matrimonial Causes Act 1973<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

When is it appropriate to treat extreme ideologies as terrorism?<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Why does a liberal democracy need a police force?<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Turkish schools to drop Darwin, but some UK schools are still teaching Creationism<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n