{"id":1671,"date":"2019-09-25T13:50:53","date_gmt":"2019-09-25T12:50:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/?p=1671"},"modified":"2025-11-14T10:20:56","modified_gmt":"2025-11-14T10:20:56","slug":"why-parliament-cannot-be-shut-down-or-shut-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/2019\/09\/25\/why-parliament-cannot-be-shut-down-or-shut-up\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Parliament cannot be shut down or shut up"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.17.6″ menu_id=”8″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.17.6″ featured_placement=”above” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” date_format=”j M Y” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The content of this blog draws upon some of the material in an article by Javier Garc<\/em>\u00eda Oliva, published in El Pais on 25th<\/sup> September 2019.\u00a0 Please see the link below. <\/em><\/p>\n

The word \u201cprorogation\u201d doesn\u2019t exactly trip off the tongue, and until recently, very few people had any reason to use it.\u00a0 Even now, when it is being flashed all over the news and social media, there is some confusion about what it actually means.\u00a0 What exactly is prorogation, and why has it caused so much trouble?<\/p>\n

In short, is the technical name for closing down the legislature at the end of a \u201csession.\u201d\u00a0 Usually, a \u201cParliament\u201d (i.e. stretch of time between General Elections) is divided into five sessions, and as might be expected with fixed term Parliaments of five years, each session tends to be roughly 12 months. However, there is no rule that this must be so.\u00a0 Instead of running out of a specified date, a session is brought to a close with an exercise of the Royal Prerogative.\u00a0 It is important to appreciate that although the power is theoretically vested in the Monarch, in reality they are simply acting at the direction of the Prime Minister, because the Queen does not make active political decisions of any sort.\u00a0 (Were she to try, it is probable that the legal role of a hereditary Monarch in the British Constitution would be rapidly and drastically reformed, as an individual wielding executive authority solely on the basis of birth-right is fundamentally incompatible with a liberal democratic context in the XXI century).<\/p>\n

Crucially, it must be understood that: 1) prorogation is ordinarily a short-term situation; and 2) it is something far more extreme than a spell of recess for a holiday.\u00a0 In other words, it isn\u2019t just pressing the pause button, but a complete suspension of the legislature.\u00a0 E.g, during a period of prorogation, MPs may not even ask written or oral questions of Ministers about governmental matters.<\/p>\n

This explains why Boris Johnson\u2019s recent attempt to prorogue Parliament was so controversial, and also ultimately why it was found to be unlawful.\u00a0 Many observers consider that the Prime Minister used Prorogation as a means of preventing Parliament from overseeing the Brexit process at a critical stage. It is certainly true that in terms of evidence before the judges, the Government failed to put forward any reason why Parliament needed to be shut down for five weeks, as opposed to the five or six days ordinarily needed to prepare the Queen\u2019s Speech.\u00a0 In the absence of any compelling justification, the court had no basis upon which it could uphold a decision to dispense with Parliament.\u00a0 The judges ruled unanimously that the Prerogative can only <\/em>be used in accordance with the Constitution, and that this application offended two core pillars of the British legal framework: Parliamentary Sovereignty and Parliamentary Accountability.<\/p>\n

Parliamentary Sovereignty means that the Legislature is the supreme force in the juridical system, it can make whatever laws it chooses and both the courts and the executive must defer to its authority.\u00a0 The sister concept of Parliamentary Accountability is the tenet which states that the Prime Minister, and the remaining members of the Government, are collectively answerable to the legislature. Obviously, if the Government could simply dispense with Parliament indefinitely and at will, this function of oversight would be fatally undermined.<\/p>\n

The effect of the judgment is that the purported Prorogation was invalid from its inception, and therefore, the current parliamentary session has not been terminated.\u00a0 The House of Commons Speaker John Bercow immediately announced that MPs would sit the following day, and Boris Johnson for his part has indicated that he will respect the ruling, despite having previously made far more ambivalent statements. He maintains that the decision was incorrect, and whilst he stops short of attacking the judges, asserts that their stance, along with the intransigence of Parliament, is making the task of negotiating a better Brexit deal a more difficult one.<\/p>\n

For their part, the judges have been at pains to assert that this decision is not about how Brexit should happen, nor whether it should go ahead.\u00a0 Pre-empting anticipated criticism from anti-European sections of the press, Baroness Hale, correctly stressed that there was no question of trespassing on the territory of Parliament or the executive.\u00a0 Judges have for centuries exercised a supervisory jurisdiction over politicians, which inevitably means addressing questions related to controversial matters; nevertheless this does not make judges political, because they are simply assessing whether other actors have stayed within the scope of their authority.\u00a0 This is not about what should happen, it is about who has a constitutional mandate to decide upon what should happen.\u00a0 In this historic decision, rather than damaging the British settlement in relation to the Separation of Powers, the Supreme Court has bolstered it, by affirming Parliamentary Sovereignty and thwarting attempts to circumvent its effect.<\/p>\n

It was no accident that Baroness Hale rooted her decision in the famous 1611 judicial finding that “the King hath no prerogative but that which the law of the land allows him”.\u00a0 <\/em>\u00a0The last time that the executive attempted to dispense with Parliamentary rule was slightly later in the Stuart era, and it ended in Civil War and the eventual execution of a King who refused to recognise the limitations of his powers.\u00a0 Not to mention the rather later case of some rather disgruntled British citizens in North America, who took exception to being denied access to Parliamentary democracy, which also didn\u2019t end especially well for the Government in Westminster.\u00a0\u00a0 All things considered, whatever strategy the Prime Minister adopts going forward, trying to bypass the legislature may not be the best move.<\/p>\n

Related Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

R (Miller) v The Prime Minister<\/a> [2019] UKSC 41<\/p>\n

Preservando la supremac\u00eda parlamentaria<\/a> (El Pais 24\/9\/19)<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

Perverting education and the relevance of gay penguins<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

More Catholic than the Pope: Same sex unions, families and civil rights<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Betraying the People or Serving the Nation? Brexit, Dominic Grieve and the Constitution<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n