{"id":1772,"date":"2018-06-28T13:15:07","date_gmt":"2018-06-28T12:15:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/?p=1772"},"modified":"2025-11-26T11:16:33","modified_gmt":"2025-11-26T11:16:33","slug":"marriage-v-civil-partnership-whats-in-a-name","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/2018\/06\/28\/marriage-v-civil-partnership-whats-in-a-name\/","title":{"rendered":"Marriage v Civil Partnership: What\u2019s in a name?"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.17.6″ menu_id=”8″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.17.6″ featured_placement=”above” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” date_format=”j M Y” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

\"\"What\u2019s in a name? That which we call a rose,<\/em>
By any other name would smell as sweet.<\/em><\/p>\n

Given that romantic partnerships are the topic of this blog, a quotation from Romeo and Juliette<\/em> is not out of keeping with the theme.\u00a0 However, the question posed by one of the star-crossed lovers goes to the heart of the legal and social debate around marriage and civil partnership.\u00a0 At the outset, it is vital to understand that in terms of legal rights, there is no material difference between civil partnership and marriage<\/em><\/strong>.\u00a0 (Please note, especially if you are student of English family law and don\u2019t want to hear your lecturer sobbing, the term \u201ccivil partnership\u201d does NOT describe people who are cohabiting, but not married).<\/p>\n

Winding the clock back in order to understand the context of this discussion, in 2004, the Government introduced civil partnerships for same-sex couples.\u00a0 This was a legal institution which allowed them to have a legally registered partnership, placing them in practical terms in almost an identical position to heterosexual married people. The importance of this development should not be underestimated, given that the legal protection available to cohabitants in this jurisdiction is flimsy or non-existent for most purposes.\u00a0 Some safeguards are in place in situations of domestic abuse, to ensure that victims are not faced with a stark choice between tolerating ill-treatment or immediate <\/em>homelessness, but the courts do not have powers to redistribute property, nor order maintenance payments where relationships break down.\u00a0 If one partner is financially dependent on the other, perhaps having sacrificed their career and earning potential to look after a shared home and young family, their material outlook is going to be pretty bleak if a bitter ex doesn\u2019t feel inclined to treat them fairly.\u00a0 Thus, civil partnership in many ways gave people in same-sex relationships the chance to secure their future, and that of the person they loved, as well as affording them legal recognition and benefits in the present.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, there was a big but: \u00a0everybody agreed that civil partnership was not<\/em> marriage, and the social status accorded to it was different.\u00a0 At worst, it could be argued that same-sex couples were forced into a legal ghetto, whilst Parliament did not allow them to share the same territory as those in male\/female unions.\u00a0\u00a0 For this reason, the campaign to introduce same-sex marriage continued, and it showed the diversity of views about the nature of this institution.\u00a0 The word \u2018marriage\u2019 was a prize worth fighting for, in the eyes of LGBTQ equality campaigners, and also for the conservative elements within society who resisted opening marriage to same-sex couples.\u00a0 \u00a0In 2013 an outstanding step strengthening equality took place and same-sex marriage<\/em> was introduced.<\/p>\n

Interestingly, civil partnership was not abolished with this legal development. Consequently, we were left with a legal system which allowed same-sex couples to choose between marriage and civil partnership, but left opposite couples with marriage or nothing.\u00a0 The Supreme Court has now ruled that this is discriminatory as far as the latter are concerned, and that the current legislation is in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998.\u00a0 This ruling has not, and cannot change the law. Due to the principle of Parliamentary Supremacy, not even judges in the Supreme Court have the power to strike down an Act of Parliament, but as a result of this decision there will now be considerable moral pressure on the Government to address this.<\/p>\n

In our view, this is the correct outcome and should be welcomed.\u00a0 The strength of feeling on all sides of the debate on the introduction of same-sex marriage demonstrated that a label does <\/em>matter.\u00a0\u00a0 Marriage is an institution with immense social, cultural and historical baggage.\u00a0\u00a0 The law now affords same-sex couples the same right as other citizens to opt into this institution if they wish to do so, but it also gives them the chance to opt out, without being legally disadvantaged in relation to tax, inheritance, protection in the event of a relationship breaking down, home rights, etc, etc.\u00a0 Opposite sex couples can opt in or out, but if they opt out they are legally in an exposed and inferior position at the moment.<\/p>\n

There are many serious, ideological reasons why some people reject marriage.\u00a0 Its perceived associations with religion, patriarchy and heteronormative oppression are enough to render it unappealing, or even indefensible, in some eyes.\u00a0 Of course, it goes without saying that many other citizens see things very differently!\u00a0 However, giving everybody<\/em> the right to choose between marriage and civil partnership would allow universal freedom of conscience, and not make it dependent upon whether their life partner happened to share their gender.<\/p>\n

Related Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keiden) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the International Development (in substitution for the Home Secretary and the Education Secretary) (Respondent)<\/a> [2018] UKSC 32<\/p>\n

Heterosexual Couple win Civil Partnership Case<\/a> (BBC News <\/em>27\/6\/18)<\/p>\n

Civil Partnership Ruling Means That We Can All Move On From Marriage<\/a> (The Guardian <\/em>27\/6\/18)<\/p>\n

Marriage (Same Sex Couples Act) 2013<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

President Macron: Religion and Secularism in France<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Naturism and Hate Crime: The Bare Facts<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Turkish schools to drop Darwin, but some UK schools are still teaching Creationism<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n