{"id":1867,"date":"2017-09-19T11:35:09","date_gmt":"2017-09-19T10:35:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/?p=1867"},"modified":"2025-11-26T17:04:43","modified_gmt":"2025-11-26T17:04:43","slug":"cake-cases-gay-marriage-freedom-of-expression-in-northern-ireland-and-the-usa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.manchester.ac.uk\/religion-law-and-the-constitution\/2017\/09\/19\/cake-cases-gay-marriage-freedom-of-expression-in-northern-ireland-and-the-usa\/","title":{"rendered":"Cake cases: gay marriage, freedom of expression in Northern Ireland and the USA"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.17.6″ menu_id=”8″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.17.6″ featured_placement=”above” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” date_format=”j M Y” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

The US Supreme court will soon delivered its verdict on a case involving a Christian baker with objections to same sex marriage.\u00a0\u00a0 Followers of the Lee v Ashers Baking Co litigation may experience a sensation of d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu, but only up to a certain point.\u00a0 Although the facts of the cases were extremely similar, the courts came to radically different conclusions in resolving the clash of rights.<\/p>\n

In short, both situations involved a refusal to produce a cake celebrating or promoting gay marriage. In the American case, the US Justice Department are supporting the baker, arguing that\u00a0 producing a cake is a creative act, and that an artist should not be compelled to use his talents to express a sentiment which conflicted with his religious beliefs.\u00a0 In contrast the appellate court in Northern Ireland took a more pragmatic stance.\u00a0 It ruled that a baker might be asked to ice a cake in the colours of a particular football team for a client, but that did not amount to expressing support for the team.\u00a0 By analogy, producing the cake promoting gay marriage could not be equated with expressing support for that institution.<\/p>\n

The court in Lee was crystal clear that when it came to accepting orders for cakes with political or religious connotations, a commercial enterprise was not free to discriminate.\u00a0 It would have been perfectly acceptable for a baker to refuse all <\/em>commissions with a political or religious dimension, but accepting some meant accepting all.\u00a0\u00a0 There could be no scope to pick and choose, and agree to take orders from people expressing messages deemed to be desirable.\u00a0 The reasoning undoubtedly has a commendable clarity to it, and in a place where sectarian tensions still run high, it is easy to see the appeal of this approach.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, if creating a cake is seen as an act of artistic expression, then it is possible to follow the logic of the argument being played out in the States.\u00a0 An artist might be said to put something of his or her own self into a creation, and forcing someone to put a piece of their soul into a message they find offensive does indeed appear oppressive.<\/p>\n

However, if a person is seeking to make money from their art, the waters are undoubtedly muddied.\u00a0\u00a0 Would it be acceptable, for example, for a photographer to claim a religious or political objection to interracial marriage, and refuse to do portrait photos for families who didn\u2019t conform to his worldview? \u00a0Should artistic freedom really be used as a shield for those wanting to discriminate on the basis of protected characteristics (gender, race, sexuality, disability etc)?<\/p>\n

Also, where exactly are the boundaries of artistic expression?\u00a0 It might be asked whether there is a difference between producing a bespoke, handcrafted cake with sculpted icing, and scanning a computer image of Sesame Street\u2019s Bert and Ernie onto a standard white square.\u00a0 Some bakers might be covered whilst others might not.\u00a0 And where and how could value judgements be made about the difference between artistic expression and providing a service.\u00a0\u00a0 If someone running a bicycle repair shop feels that giving each individual bicycle tender loving care is an art, is it appropriate for a third party to declare that it is merely a mechanical process?\u00a0 The more that the artistic expression pathway is explored, the more problematic it seems.<\/p>\n

This is not to say that the neutral, all or nothing, approach of the court in Northern Ireland is straightforward.\u00a0 For instance Peter Tatchell, the leading gay rights campaigner, unexpectedly expressed support for Ashers Bakery, on the basis of freedom of expression.\u00a0 Tatchell suggested that if the reasoning in the case were followed to its natural conclusion, then a Jewish printer would be obliged to produce a book denying the holocaust.\u00a0 In his view, individuals should not be compelled to express something repugnant to them.<\/p>\n

Tatchell\u2019s point certainly generates pause for thought.\u00a0 However, there are arguably more appropriate legal ways to deal with this kind of problem; in many instances, deeply offensive messages would fall foul of the law on hate speech (see further the Public Order Act 1986).\u00a0 But if a message does not amount to hate speech, then arguably freedom of expression demands that it should be granted a place in the public domain.\u00a0 If bakers, printers, graphic designers and others were allowed to reject work from individuals or groups whose beliefs they consider undesirable, then surely minority belief groups within society would potentially struggle to make their voice heard.\u00a0 On this basis, it might be argued that the approach of the court in Northern Ireland defends freedom of expression rather than crushing it.<\/p>\n

Related Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

In major Supreme Court case, Justice Dept. sides with baker who refused to make wedding cake for gay couple<\/a> (Washington Post-07\/09\/17)<\/p>\n

Lee v Ashers Baking Co-summary of judgment<\/a> (NI Court of Appeal-24\/10\/16)<\/p>\n

Ashers \u2018gay cake\u2019 verdict defeat for freedom of expression<\/a> (Peter Tatchell Foundation-24\/10\/16)<\/p>\n

Protected Characteristics<\/a> (Equality and Human Rights Commission)<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

Covid-19 and Religious Freedom<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Freemen on the Land-Freedom of Belief is NOT Freedom from Law<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Enforced Exorcism at Work: An unusual US case<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n