MANCEPT

MANCEPT

  • MANCEPT
  • People
  • MANCEPT Workshops
    • List of Panels (A-Z) 2025
    • Panel Locations / Map
  • Brave New World
    • Brave New World 2026
    • Brave New World 2025
    • Brave New World 2024
    • Brave New World 2023
    • Brave New World 2022
    • Brave New World 2021
Select Page
  • MANCEPT
  • People
  • MANCEPT Workshops
    • List of Panels (A-Z) 2025
    • Panel Locations / Map
  • Brave New World
    • Brave New World 2026
    • Brave New World 2025
    • Brave New World 2024
    • Brave New World 2023
    • Brave New World 2022
    • Brave New World 2021
MANCEPT / MANCEPT Workshops / MANCEPT Workshops 2023 / List of Panels (A-Z) 2023 / Moral and Public Agency in Early Chinese Philosophy

Moral and Public Agency in Early Chinese Philosophy

Eirik Lang Harris (Colorado State University); Henrique Schneider (Nordakademie) 

Online

Early, or Classical, Chinese Philosophy is a label encompassing the Spring and Autumn and Warring States Periods (771-221 BCE) of Chinese history. In those times of chaos and conflict, philosophy emerged as a tool for answering the question of how to establish order, and thus unification, peace and prosperity. Several different answers arose, some complementary, some contradictory. The philosophical works that arguably still form the basis of Chinese philosophy are the fruits of that time, including Kongzi’s (Confucius’) Analects, the Guanzi, the Hanfeizi, the Mozi, the Daodejing (Tao Te King) of Laozi, the Book of Lord Shang, and many more.  

Put in contemporary terms: The quest for order was the overall goal of these different philosophies on a macro-level. On a micro-level, however, agency was central. Early Chinese Philosophy understood – arguably before any other system of thought – how agency is central to order. For several reasons, this is interesting:  

  • Arguably, Chinese philosophy developed a conception of agency without (necessarily) tying it to individualism, or, to put the claim more robustly, Early Chinese Philosophy dealt with agency without accepting individualism. 
  • Early Chinese Philosophy understood agency as the link between the micro and the macro level: order can only prevail if agents behave in certain ways. As such, agency was understood as a public endeavor. 
  • The question of how agents ought to behave was answered differently among the philosophers, and a major point of contention was whether agency tied to morality led to order or not. If it did, which kind of morality led to order? If it did not, what was the alternative? 

This workshop will explore the issue of agency in Early Chinese Philosophy. Highlighting agency as central to Chinese moral thinking as well as to political philosophy, discussing following aspects:  

  • The content and controversies of moral agency 
  • The content and controversies of public agency 
  • The link between moral and public agency 
  • The relationship between agency, politics, order, and general morality 
  • Different types of moral agency depending on public functions 
  • Problems between principals and agents 

The goal of this workshop is, first, to make Early Chinese Philosophy available to a larger public with a background in analytic ethics, second, to investigate the content, controversies, and interrelations of the discourse on agency in Early Chinese Philosophy, and third, to advance Chinese philosophical thought beyond the scope of comparative philosophy.  

While specialists in Chinese philosophy, the contributors to this volume employ jargon-free language enabling them to explain Chinese philosophical terms and ideas, and their implications, to a wide audience. While uncompromising in the philosophical content of Early Chinese Philosophy, this workshop demonstrates the relevance of these ideas to contemporary discourses on morality and political action, in an analytic as well as in a broader context.  

 

This workshop will take place online. The schedule has been prepared to fit the participants’ different time-zones.

 


Monday 11th September

 

 

11:00-12:30

Registration

12:30-13:30

Lunch

13:30-14:00

Welcome Speech

14:00-16:00

Session 1

Chair: Eirik Harris

Emily Kluge: Problems with Han Fei

Nalei Chen: The Principal-Agent Problem in the Han Feizi

16:00-16:30

Tea and Coffee Break (optional)

16:30-17:30

Session 1 (continued)

Thomas Moore: Is Confucianism Synthesisable with a Laclauian Conception of Democracy?

17:45-19:00

Wine Reception

19:30

Conference Dinner


Tuesday 12th September

 

 

9:30-11:30

N/A

 

11:30-12:00

Tea and Coffee Break (optional)

12:00-13:00

N/A

 

13:00-14:00

Lunch

14:00-16:00

Session 3

Chair: Henrique Schneider

John R. Williams: Zhuangzi and the Reconstrual of Agency in Downtroden Times

Stephen Walker: Fathomless Leadership in the Huainanzi

16:00-16:30

Tea and Coffee Break (optional)

16:30-17:30

Session 3 (continued)

Lilith W. Lee: How to Do Things with Zhiyan: Enactive Agency and Critical Participatory Sense-Making in the Zhuangzi


Wednesday 13th September

 

 

9:30-11:30

N/A

 

11:30-12:00

Tea and Coffee Break (optional)

12:00-13:00

N/A

 

13:00-14:00

Lunch

14:00-16:00

Session 5

Chair: Henrique Schneider

Frankie Chick: When Ren could not Bring Peace to the World: On the Amoral ability in the Analects

Henrique Schneider: Agency in the Guanzi

16:00-16:30

Tea and Coffee Break (optional)

16:30-17:30

Session 5 (continued)

Eirik Harris: Public Agency in Mozi and Han Fei

17:30

End of Conference

 

 

 

Contact Us

+44 (0) 161 306 6000

mancept-workshops@manchester.ac.uk

 

Find Us

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK

Connect With Us

  • Facebook page for The University of Manchester
  • Twitter page for The University of Manchester
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress

  • Disclaimer /
  • Data Protection /
  • Copyright notice /
  • Accessibility /
  • Freedom of information /
  • Charitable status /
  • Royal Charter Number: RC000797
Tweets by OfficialUoM
The University of Manchester