- Home
- Aims
- Musings
- The issues
- Refugees and asylum seekers
- (2016-7) Beyond the label of ‘refugees’
- (2016-7) Making the familiar unfamiliar
- (2017-8) Anthropological perspectives on refugee children
- (2017-8) Why people want refugee status
- (2018-9) An anthropological perspective on the variations of refugee suffering that sheds light onto the required multiplicity of humanitarian aid
- (2018-9) Refugee status: The interdependence of production and destruction
- (2019-2020) How does the Hostile Environment prevent refugees and asylum seekers from creating a fully integrated social life in the UK, and how is this resisted?
- (2019-2020) Challenges for Female Refugees and Asylum Seekers
- (2020-2021) How has the climate crisis affected refugees and asylum seekers?
- (2020-2021) How has Brexit affected family reunification policy in the UK?
- (2021-2022) Deconstructing the Refugee: Understanding both the biological and the social lives of refugees
- (2021-2022) Bare Life in relation to child refugees
- (2022-2023) Aid as a way to govern people in a refugee camp
- (2022-2023) The Road to Resettlement
- Humanitarianism in crisis situations
- (2016-7) Disaster capitalism: An investigation of the NHS crisis
- (2016-7) Immediate humanitarian concerns and long-term ethnographies
- (2017-8) How can an anthropological study of kinship within the context of conflict reveal how different families cope with crisis situations?
- (2017-8) The impact of armed conflict on kinship, identity and family separation
- (2018-9) Technologies in crises: Politics of inequality or empowerment?
- (2018-9) To what extent can neutrality prevail in a state of crisis?
- (2019-2020) How do anthropological studies on the role of compassion, crisis and kinship in humanitarian work help us to understand the Red Cross family tracing service as a form of governance?
- (2019-2020) How anthropological perspectives can improve family tracing and reunification through broadening our understanding of kinship
- Rethinking development
- (2016-7) Two contrasting anthropological approaches to development
- (2016-7) Unintended consequences?: Power, politics and cultural relativism
- (2017-8) Linking development expertise with local lived experience
- (2017-8) The (failing) promise of CSR to deliver development
- (2018-9) Can faith-based organisations offer a different way of development?
- (2018-9) Rethinking the semantics of development
- (2019-2020) Rethinking Philanthropy Within Development
- (2019-2020) Corporate Philanthropy and its ulterior motives
- (2020-2021) How COVID has affected Sudan’s insecurity
- (2020-2021) Rethinking Chinese Development Projects in Africa
- (2021-2022) Rethinking development: intentions, outcomes, and recipient agency
- (2021-2022) Rethinking Development & Female Education Lesson Plan
- (2022-2023) How the pervasiveness of the HIV treatment regime has reinforced HIV stigmatisation in African societies
- (2022-2023) Exploring and Rethinking the Housing and Homelessness Crisis in Manchester
- Beyond the Developing World
- (2016-7) Beyond the binary of ‘developed’ and ‘developing’
- (2016-7) Dialogue through anthropological approaches
- (2017-8) Beyond the developing world: Anthropological perspectives on foodbanks
- (2017-8) How can we understand poverty beyond the developing world?
- (2018-9) How can anthropological perspectives help us understand the Grenfell Tower fire as a humanitarian issue?
- (2018-9) Responsibility of care: who is responsible for the most vulnerable?
- (2019-2020) Not Hired, On-Boarded: Precarious Employment and Shaping the Neoliberal Subject
- (2019-2020) How does an anthropological perspective help us to understand the role of development in Moss Side?
- (2020-2021) Displacement in Lockdown
- (2021-2022) ‘Crisis’ and the Unintended Consequences of Aid
- (2021-2022) Compassion Beyond the Developing World
- (2022-2023) A Crisis of Categorisation: The Evolving Portrayals and Perceptions of Displaced People Over the Course of the 2015 European Refugee Crisis
- (2022-2023) How the treatment of refugees beyond the developing world reduces individuals to a state of liminal bare life
- Professions of ‘doing good’
- (2016-7) Questioning representations
- (2016-7) The moral labour of aid work
- (2017-8) Professions of ‘doing good’: The dangers of voluntourism
- (2017-8) To what extent is it useful to explore ‘doing good’ through the lens of performativity?
- (2018-9) Citizens of aidland: Exploring the subjectivity of aid workers in the field
- (2018-9) Disparities in pay amongst foreign and local aid workers
- (2019-2020) ‘The road to hell is paved with good intentions’: a discussion of the importance of intention in volunteering
- (2019-2020) Negotiating the consequences of ‘Doing Good’: How anthropological perspectives inform Student Development and Community Engagement initiatives at the University of Manchester
- (2020-2021) The Neoliberal discourse driving compassion fatigue in the NHS
- (2020-2021) The consequences of moral and expert authority: obstetric racism
- (2021-2022) The Personal Experiences of Aid Work
- (2021-2022) Immaterial labour in ‘Aidland’
- (2022-2023) Hegemonic Representations and Aid Workers
- (2022-2023) Between a rock and a hard place: the ways in which refugees and aid workers alike navigate agency and identity
- Refugees and asylum seekers
- Meeting aid workers
- Contact us
2018-9 Final Event
On the 14th of December, 2018, the students met with four professionals in the fields of development, humanitarianism, refugee assistance, and volunteer coordination. They discussed the blog entries that the student groups had written, as well as other issues such as racism and immigration policies in the UK, dilemmas that NGO workers face, and how to address the wide income and other gaps between expats and local aid workers. After group discussions, the visitors spoke about ways to enter a career in humanitarian and development work, and their own experiences starting out in the field. Conversations continued well into lunch time and beyond.
Based on exchanges I overheard, I imagine many of these conversations will continue beyond the classroom. Studying social anthropology as an undergraduate student might seem removed from ‘real world’ issues but this event showed that it does not have to be that way. In fact, with long-term fieldwork and ethnographic research that involves ‘deep hanging out’, anthropologists can offer unique insights. I hope this event can be the beginning of a life-long journey of exploration for everyone who participated.
Contact us
+44 (0) 161 306 6000